 |
 |

Anti-fibrinolytic
Agents in Traumatic Haemorrhage
Tim Coats
University of Leicester
Beverley Hunt
Guy's & St Thomas' Trust
Ian Roberts
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Haleema Shakur
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Address for
correspondence
CRASH-2 trial co-ordinating centre
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine,
Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Phone 0207 958 8128
Fax: 0207 299 4663
Ian.roberts@lshtm.ac.uk
A large scale randomised controlled trial is needed.
For people at ages 5 to 45 years,
trauma is second only to HIV/AIDS as a cause of death. Each year,
worldwide, over three million people die as a result of trauma, many
after reaching hospital.[1] Among trauma patients who do survive to
reach hospital, exsanguination is a common cause of death,
accounting for nearly half of in-hospital trauma deaths.[2] Central
nervous system injury and multi-organ failure account for most of
the remainder, both of which can be exacerbated by severe
bleeding.[3]
The haemostatic system helps to
maintain the integrity of the circulatory system after severe
vascular injury, whether traumatic or surgical in origin.[4] Major
surgery and trauma trigger similar haemostatic responses and any
consequent massive blood loss presents an extreme challenge to the
coagulation system. Part of the response to surgery and trauma, in
any patient, is stimulation of clot breakdown (fibrinolysis) which
may become pathological (hyper-fibrinolysis) in some.4 Anti-fibrinolytic
agents have been shown to reduce blood loss in patients with both
normal and exaggerated fibrinolytic responses to surgery, and do so
without apparently increasing the risk of post-operative
complications, most notably there is no increased risk of venous
thromboembolism.[5]
Systemic anti-fibrinolytic agents
are widely used in major surgery to prevent fibrinolysis and thus
reduce surgical blood loss. A recent systematic review[6] of
randomised controlled trials of anti-fibrinolytic agents (mainly
aprotinin or tranexamic acid) in elective surgical patients
identified 89 trials including 8,580 randomised patients (74 trials
in cardiac, eight in orthopaedic, four in liver, and three in
vascular surgery). The results showed that these treatments reduced
the numbers needing transfusion by one third, reduced the volume
needed per transfusion by one unit, and halved the need for further
surgery to control bleeding. These differences were all highly
statistically significant. There was also a statistically
non-significant reduction in the risk of death (RR=0.85: 95%CI 0.63
to 1.14) in the anti-fibrinolytic treated group.
Because the haemostatic
abnormalities that occur after injury are similar to those after
surgery, it is possible that anti-fibrinolytic agents might also
reduce blood loss, the need for transfusion and mortality following
trauma. However, to date there has been only one small randomised
controlled trial (70 randomised patients, drug versus placebo: 0
versus 3 deaths) of the effect of anti-fibrinolytic agents in major
trauma.[7] As a result, there is insufficient evidence to either
support or refute a clinically important treatment effect. Systemic
anti-fibrinolytic agents have been used in the management of eye
injuries where there is some evidence that they reduce the rate of
secondary haemorrhage.8
A simple and widely practicable
treatment that reduces blood loss following trauma might prevent
thousands of premature trauma deaths each year and secondly could
reduce exposure to the risks of blood transfusion. Blood is a scarce
and expensive resource and major concerns remain about the risk of
transfusion-transmitted infection. Trauma is common in parts of the
world where the safety of blood transfusion is not assured. A
recent study in Uganda estimated the population-attributable
fraction of HIV acquisition as a result of blood transfusion to be
around 2%, although some estimates are much higher.[9,10] Only 43%
of the 191 WHO member states test blood for HIV, hepatitis C and B
viruses. Every year, unsafe transfusion and injection practices are
estimated to account for 8-16 million Hepatitis B infections,
2.3-4.7 million Hepatitis C infections and 80,000-160,000 HIV
infections.[11] A large randomised trial is therefore needed of the
use of a simple, inexpensive, widely practicable anti-fibrinolytic
treatment such as tranexamic acid (aprotinin is considerably more
expensive and is a bovine product with consequent risk of allergic
reaction and hypothetically transmission of disease), in a wide
range of trauma patients, who when they reach hospital are thought
to be at risk of major haemorrhage that could significantly affect
their chances of survival.
The CRASH 2 trial will be a large
international, placebo controlled trial of the effects of the early
administration of the anti-fibrinolytic agent tranexamic acid on
death, vascular events and transfusion requirements.[12] The trial
aims to recruit some 20,000 patients with trauma and will be one of
the largest trauma trials ever conducted. However, it will only be
possible to conduct such a trial if hundreds of healthcare
professionals worldwide work together to recruit patients to the
trial in order to make it a success.
References
1. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global health statistics: a
compendium of incidence, prevalence and mortality estimates for over
200 conditions. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston: Harvard
University Press, 1996.
2. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore E, Moser K, Brennan R, Read RA, Pons
PT. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J
Trauma1995;38:185-193.
3. The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of
Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical
Care. Hypotension.
J Neurotrauma. 2000;17(6-7):591-5.
4. Lawson JH, Murphy MP. Challenges for providing effective
hemostasis in surgery and trauma. Semin Hematol 2004;41:55-64.
5. Porte RJ, Leebeek FW. Pharmacological strategies to decrease
transfusion requirements in patients undergoing surgery. Drugs 2002;
62: 2193-211.
6. Henry DA, Moxey AJ, Carless PA, O'Connell D, McClelland B,
Henderson KM, Sly K, Laupacis A, Fergusson D. Antifibrinolytic use
for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (Cochrane
Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester, UK:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
7. Coats T, Roberts I, Shakur H. Antifibrinolytic drugs for acute
traumatic injury. (Cochrane Review). In preparation for: The
Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd.
8. Aylward GW, Dunlop IS, Little BC. Meta-analysis of systemic
antifibrinolytics in traumatic hyphema. Eye 1994;8:440-442.
9. Kiwanuka N, Gray RH, Serwadda D, et al. The incidence of HIV-1
associated with injections and transfusions in a prospective cohort,
Raki, Uganda. AIDS 2004;18:342-343.
10. Heymann SJ, Brewer TF. The problem of transfusion associated
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in Africa: a quantitative
approach. Am J Infection Control 1992;20:256-62.
11. Goodnough LT, Shander A, Brecher ME. Transfusion medicine:
looking to the future. Lancet 2003; 361: 161-9.
12. www.crash2.lshtm.ac.uk
|
This is a
non-peer reviewed article. Accepted for publication on
Feb 2,2005
Cite as:
Coats T,Hunt B,Roberts
I,Shakur H
Anti-fibrinolytic agents in traumatic haemorrhage
Calicut Medical Journal 2005;3(1):e1
URL:
http://www.calicutmedicaljournal.org/2005/3/1/e1
|
|
|
|